Supreme Court of India
Subraya M.N. v. Vittala M.N. & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In the result, the judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dated 20.03.2008 in R.F.A. No.805 of 1998 is set aside so far as suit property items No.
Judgment, page 15
From the headnote
Partition - Suit by plaintiffs (brothers of the defendant) - For partition of suit schedule property at Item Nos. 1,2 and 3 which was ioint family property - Alleging that the defendant was attempting to grab the suit properties - In the Written Statement defendant stated that Plaintiff Nos. 1 and 2 had sold their shares to the defendant and the plaintiff Nos. 3 and 4 had also relinquished their rights in the Item Nos. 1 and 2 and the same was recorded in Panchayat Resolution (Exb. D22); that Item No. 3 was his self-acquired property and thus plaintiffs were not entitled to partition - During
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Korukonda Chalapathi Rao & Anr. v. Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar
- 2019 Thulasidhara & Another v. Narayanappa & Others
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.