Supreme Court of India
B.A. Umesh v. Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that age of 30 years (at the time of incident), in the present facts and circumstances of the case cannot be a ground to show any kind of leniency on sentence.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: s.235(2) - Hearing on question of sentence - Plea that no separate date for hearing on sentence was given by trial court as such for violation of s.235(2), sentence of death cannot be affirmed - Held: There is no mandate in s.235(2) to fix separate date for hearing on sentence - It depends on the facts and circumstances as to whether a separate date is required for hearing on sentence or parties feel convenient to argue on sentence on the same day - As such, merely for the reason that no separate date is given for hearing on the sentence, the review petition
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Shatrughna Baban Meshram v. State of Maharashtra
- 2019 Accused 'x' v. State of Maharashtra
- 2017 Vasanta Sampat Dupare v. State of Maharashtra
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.