Supreme Court of India
Hindustan Unilever Ltd. v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
For the aforesaid reasons we are of the considered opinion that the view taken by the High Court in this case was erroneous and contrary to law.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 - ss. 16 and 13(2) c - Prosecution u/s. 16 r!w. r. 50 (I) the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 - Of 6 accused - One of the accused exercised his right uls. 13 (2) - Second as weU as third samples directed to be given to Central Food LaboratoryJCFL) for .re analysis - Petition by appellant-accused u!s. 482. Cr.PC. for ·quashing the proceedings - Dismissed by High' <;;ourt ~ On appeal, held: In a case where there are many accused, once a right is exercised ills. 13(2) by any of the accused leading to a certificate . from Director of CFL,
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.