Supreme Court of India
Chander Prakash Tyagi v. Shri Benarsi Das(dead) by Lrs. and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above discussion, we are unable to accept the argument advanced on behalf of the appellant that the appellant has committed no misconduct as the G proceedings in which the appellant appeared for and against the same client are different in nature, particularly, in view of the fact that the property involved in both the cases was H 4 (2012) 1 sec 741 CHANDER PRAKASH TYAGI v.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Advocates Act, 1961; Bar Council of India Rules: Part VI; Section II Regulation 33 - Misconduct - Collusion of Advocate. with opponents - Complaint against appellant Advocate that he having accepted the fee from the complainant for contesting a case for guardianship of his grandson, also subsequently accepted brief from opponents for filing suit against complainant's grandson - Complaint dismissed by State Bar Council on the ground that the appellant had withdrawn his Vakalatnama from two suits and that the two proceedings were of different nature - On appeal, Bar Council of India held the
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.