Supreme Court of India
L. Laxmikanta v. State by Superintendent of Police, Lokayukta
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988: ss. 7, 13(1 )(d) rlw s. 13(2) - Demand of illegal gratification and its acceptance - Conviction by courts below - Held: There was no infirmity in the evidence of complainant and shadow witness which was consistent on the issue of demand 0 and acceptance of illegal gratification from the complainant and is without any contradiction - Conviction upheld. Dismissing the appeal, the Court HELD: 1. perusal of evidence of complainant (PW- 3) and the shadow witness (PW-4) showed that it was consistent on the issue of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.