Supreme Court of India
Nayankumar Shivappa Waghmare v. State of Maharashtra
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the trial court did err in law in giving benefit of reasonable doubt in the present case relating to corruption.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss. 7 and 13(1 )(d) rw s. 13(2), 20 - Public servant taking gratification for an official act - Complainant alleging that the appellant-public servant demanded and accepted bribe from him for clearing his sister's pension papers and GPF dues - Trial court acquitting the accused from the charge of offence punishable ulss. 7 and 13(1)(d) rw s. 13(2) holding that the charge is not proved beyond reasonable doubt - However, High Court convicted and sentenced him ulss. 7, 13(1 )(d) rw s.13(2) - Interference with - Held: Not called for - Apart from the suggestion
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.