Supreme Court of India
N. Sunkanna v. State of Andhra Pradesh
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988- ss. 7, 13(1)(d) rlw c 13(2) and 20- Allegation of demand and acceptance of bribe - Trap arranged- Recovery of tainted notes from the accused - During trial complainant turned hostile- The courts below relying on the Panch Witnesses and drawing presumption ul s. 20 convicted the accused- On appeal, held: There was no 0 evidence to prove that the accused made any demand Mere recovery of the tainted currency notes from the accused without proof of demand will not bring home the offence u/ s. 7 -In absence of proof of demand offence uls.13(1)(d) is also not
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.