Supreme Court of India
Yellapu Uma Maheswari &anr. v. Buddha Jagadheeswararao & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that E;xhibits 8 21 and 822 are not admissible in evidence for the purpose of proving primary purpose of partition.
Judgment, page 11
From the headnote
Deeds and Documents: r Unregistered documents - Admissibility of - In suit of c ,, f partition - Defendant introduced Exbt -21and Exbt -22 (Deed of Memorandum witnessing earlier partition and an • Agreement respectively) - Both the documents were held by courts below as not admissible - On appeal, held: s.49 of Registration Act imposes a bar on admissibility of an unregistered document which are required to be registered u/s. 17 of the Act - Admissibility of a document is entirely dependent upon the recitals contained in the document - The contents of both the documents exhibited by the
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 P. Anjanappa (d) by Lrs v. A.P. Nanjundappa & Ors.
- 2023 Infrastructure Leasing and Financial Services Ltd v. Hdfc Bank Ltd. & Anr.
- 2021 Korukonda Chalapathi Rao & Anr. v. Korukonda Annapurna Sampath Kumar
- 2018 Sita Ram Bhama v. Ramvatar Bhama
- 2015 M/s Cochin Shipyard Ltd. v. M/s Apeejay Shipping Ltd.
Of those, 5 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.