Supreme Court of India
Neon Laboratories Ltd. v. Medical Technologies Ltd. & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the decision of the Trial Court, as affirmed by the First C Appellate Court, is reasonable and judicious, and does not suffer from perversity by any dialectic that the Defendant Appellant may proffer.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Passing off- First in the market test - Suit for injunction damages and account for profit by respondent no 1 against appellant on the basis of a/legation of passing off - Respondent's case that in 1998 its predecessor-in-title introduced generic drug ROFOL and began marketing under the name PROFOL and after amalgamation of respondent no. 1 with predecessor-in-title in 2000, respondent no. 1 became the owner of the trademark PROFOL and has been using it since then, when it also applied for its registration and that the appellant had been using the mark ROFOL which is
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2024 Ramakant Ambalal Choksi v. Harish Ambalal Choksi & Others
- 2022 Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. B. Vijaya Sai and Others
Of those, 1 referred to · 1 not applicable
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.