Supreme Court of India
Jage Ram & Ors. v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860- s. 307 - Prosecution case that PW- 5 and his two sons 'S' and 'PW-6 were cutting pullas (reeds) in their fields when the accused party went there and asked them not to cut the pullas - In the wordy altercation, second accused gave pharsi blows on the head of'S' - Conviction of second accused u/s.307 IPC by Courts below- Challenged, on ground that evidence of the witnesses suffers from material discrepancy and is self-contradictory; and additionally, the defence plea of private defence was not considered by the courts below in proper perspective - Held: PWs 5 & 6 have clearly
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2019 The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Kanha @ Omprakash
- 2023 Sivamani and Anr. v. State Represented by Inspector of Police, Vellore Taluk Police Station, Vellore District
- 2021 Surinder Singh v. State (union Territory of Chandigarh)
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.