Supreme Court of India
Ram Narain v. State of U.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, this F appeal is allowed and the impugned judgment and order passed by the Trial Court as also the High Court are set aside.
Judgment, page 5
From the headnote
Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000: 57(a) - Conviction of petitioner-applicant for commission of offence uls. 302, !PC and imposition of life 0 imprisonment - Subsequent application by him for declaration of hisjuvenility on the date of incident- Juvenile Justice Board on the basis of school transfer certificate coming to conclusion that the applicant on the date of incident was 15 years, 11 months only and declared him juvenile offender- Petitioner-applicant already served sentence for more than 10 years and still in jail - Held: Applicant should get the benefit
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Om Prakash @ Israel @ Raju @ Raju Das v. Union of India and Another
- 2023 Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary v. The State of Maharashtra
- 2020 Pawan Kumar Gupta v. State of Nct of Delhi
Of those, 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.