Supreme Court of India
Mainuddin Abdul Sattar Shaikh v. Vijay D. Salvi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the respondent Vijay D Salvi is liable for the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act.
Judgment, page 8
From the headnote
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: c s. 138 - Dishonour of cheque - Liability - Apµellant booked a flat proposed to be developed by company and gave cheque to the Director-respondent of the company - Project did not materialize - Respondent drew a cheque of 0 same amount in favour of appellant of an account maintained by him with his banker towards refund of the booking amount - Dishonour of said cheque - Appellant filed complaint ul s. 138 against respondent- Trial court acquitted respondent on the ground that the company was not made party and as respondent was made accused in his personal
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Sunil Todi & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Anr.
- 2024 Bijoy Kumar Moni v. Paresh Manna & Anr.
- 2021 Pradeep S. Wodeyar v. The State of Karnataka
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.