Supreme Court of India

Aidek Tourism Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi

Neutral citation
Reported as [2015] 4 S.C.R. 295
Bench A.K. Sikri and R. F. Nariman JJ.
Decided 19 March 2015

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that since we are dealing with D exemption notification issued under Rule 8 of the Rules, which was the position in Thermax Private Limited (supra) as well, for the purpose of extending benefit of concession contained in Notification No. 64/93-CE, the principle in Thermax Private Limited (supra) would clearly become E applicable.

Judgment, page 17

From the headnote

Customs Tariff Act, 1975: s.3(1) - Concessional rate of countervailing duty in terms of Notification no.64193-CE - Eligibility for - Import of Honda accord cars manufactured abroad for the purpose of assessee's business of tourism which operates taxis to ferry the tourists from one place to another - Claim for concessional rate of CVD in terms of said Notification - Held: The importer like the assessee is deemed to be manufacturer of the said saloon car and entitled to concessional rate of countervailing duty. Disposing of the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The proviso to Notification

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.