Supreme Court of India
M/s. Queen's Educational Society v. Commissioner of Income Tax
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above facts and circumstances and therefore, exemption already granted vide order dated 4th June, 2007 is hereby withdrawn.
Judgment, page 25
From the headnote
Income Tax Act, 1961: ss.10 (23c) (iii-ad), 10(23c) (vi) - Exemption under - Held: Where an educational institution carries on the activity of education primarily for educating persons, the fact that it makes a surplus does not lead to 0 the conclusion that it ceases to exist solely for educational purposes and becomes an institution for the purpose of making profit - There is difference between the making of a surplus and an institution being carried on "for profit" - No inference arises that merely because imparting education results in making a surplus, it becomes an activity for profit -
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Visvesvaraya Technological University v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
- 2022 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (exemptions) v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
- 2022 M/s New Noble Educational Society v. The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 1 and Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 partly overruled
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.