Supreme Court of India
Vinod Kumar v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 3631109/364A - Kidnapping for ransom - Allegations that appellant-domestic servant working in the house of PW-2, along with the co-accused, kidnapped minor son of PW-2 for ransom - Trial of appellant and the co-accused u/ss. 3631109/364A - Acquittal by the trial court, however High Court passed order of conviction and sentence against the appellant - Interference with the order of High o Court - Held: Not called for - Acquittal of co-accused would not affect the case of appellant-accused - Kidnapped boy was recovered from the appellant - PW-3 categorically deposed that
Authorities it was built on
- 1973 Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade & Anr v. State of Maharashtra
- 2007 Chandrappa and Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- 1999 Rammi @ Rameshwar Etc. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2011 S. Ganesan v. Rama Raghuraman &.ors
- 2007 Girija Prasad (dead) by Lrs. v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 1971 Damodarprasad Chandrikaprasad & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra
- 2004 Anil Kumar v. State of U.P.
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Jeet Ram v. The Narcotics Control Bureau, Chandigarh
- 2022 Manoj & Ors v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.