Supreme Court of India
Paschimanchal Vidyutvitran Nigam Ltd. & Ors. v. M/sadarsh Textiles & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the foregoing reasons, we find that the view taken by the High Court of Allahabad cannot be said to be sustainable while extending the benefit of order dated 14.6.2006 to the H 498 SUPREME COURT REPORTS [2014] 14 S.C.R. A HV-2 consumers.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
c I Electricity Act, 2003 - ss. 62, 65 and 108 - Uttar Pradesh Electricity Reforms Act, 1999 - s. 12 -Policy decision dated 14. 06. 2015 of State qovernment- Regarding supply of electricity to power loom bunkers on flat rate - Whether could have been applied by the Electricity Regulatory Commission to the industries availing HV-2 category connection - Held: The decision of State 0 Government in the matter of policy, subsidy and public interest is final and binding on the Commission - The policy dated 14.06.2006 never intended to extend the benefit of subsidy to HV-2 consumers - Grant of
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.