Supreme Court of India
Madhya Pradesh State Legal Services Authority v. Prateek Jain & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that such a cost is not to be paid when the matter is sent to the Lok Adalat, this G route would be generally resorted to, to bypass the applicability of the directions contained in Damodar S. Prabhu (supra).
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTES REDRESSAL: Lok Adalats - Object and advantages - Discussed - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - s.89 - Legal Service Authority Act, 1987 - s.19. Lok Adalats - Applicability of directions/guidelines given c in *Damodar S. Prabhu case in cases which are resolved/ settled in Lok Adalats - Dishonour of cheque dispute - Settlement of dispute - Application by parties for referring the matter to Lok Ada/at - Held: If the matter is settled between the parties then it need not be referred to Lok Ada/at - Tendency of sending settled matters to Lok Ada/at deprecated - When a case is
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2015 Central Bureau of Investigation v. Maninder Singh
- 2017 M/s. Meters and Instruments Private Limited & Anr. v. Kanchan Mehta
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.