Supreme Court of India
C.K. Dasegowda & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the High Court erred in setting aside the order of E the acquittal of the appellants in the absence of any legal and factual evidence on record to prove the findings and reasons recorded in the judgment of the trial court as perverse.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - s. 324 rlw s. 34 - Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons - Conviction - Sustainability - Accused-appellants allegedly attacked PW1 and PW3 with deadly weapons and caused them injuries -Trial court gave them benefit of doubt and ordered their acquittal - Appeal before High Court which set aside the order of acquittal and convicted the appellants u/s.324 rlw s.34 /PC - Propriety - Held: High Court erred in reversing the order of trial court - o Legal principles laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Chandrappa v. State of Kamataka applied - High Court erred in
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.