Supreme Court of India

Biswanath Bhattacharya v. Union of India & Others

Neutral citation
Reported as [2014] 1 S.C.R. 885
Bench H.L. Gokhale and J. Chelameswar JJ.
Decided 21 January 2014

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the opinion that the Act is not violative of Article 20 of the Constitution.

Judgment, page 38

From the headnote

SMUGGLERS AND FOREIGN EXCHANGE MANIPULATORS (FORFEITURE OF PROPERTY) ACT, 1976: c s. 6(1) - Notice under - Requirement of recording reasons in the notice -Plea of appellant that notice issued u/s. 6 was defective as it did not contain reasons which made competent authority believe that notice scheduled properties were illegal acquired property - Held: Plea not sustainable - There is no express statutory requirement to communicate the reasons issuance of notice u/s. 6 of the Act - Secondly, the re_asons, though not initially supplied alongwith the notice were subsequently supplied thereby

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 2 referred to · 1 not applicable

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.