Supreme Court of India
Dhan Raj @ Dhand v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we are of the opinion that reliance on the extra-judicial confession of the co-accused is'misplaced. -F.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860: s.302 r/w s.341 and s.392 r/w s. 397 - Murder and robbery - Circumstantial evidence - Extra-judicial confession of co accused - Held: In two confessions made by co-accused, there are inconsistencies as in the first confession he named a different person as his accomplice who had taken the recovered articles whereas in the subsequent confession he named the two appellants as his accomplices and also stated that they had taken the recovered articles - The discrepancy is a glaring one as he named different accomplices in the same incident - Further, his confessional statement
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.