Supreme Court of India
Lalitkumar V. Sanghavi (d) Th. Lrs. Neeta Lalit Kumar Sanghavi & Anr. v. Dharamdas V. Sanghavi & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the order dated 29th October, 2007 by which the Tribunal terminated the arbitral proceedings could only fall within the scope of Section 32, sub-Section (2), sub clause (c) i.e. the continuation of the proceedings has become B impossible.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996: ss.14, 32 - Termination of arbitration proceedings by arbitrator on the ground that the claimant did not take interest in the matter and did not pay the fees - Fresh application uls. 11 for appointment of arbitrator - Dismissed as not maintainable on 0 the ground that remedy lies in invoking writ jurisdiction and not application u/s. 11 - Held: The order by which the Arbitral Tribunal terminated the arbitral proceedings could only fall within the scope of s.32(2)(c) i.e. the continuation of the proceedings has become impossible - By virtue of s.32(3),
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.