Supreme Court of India
Joginder Singh v. Union Territory of Chandigarh & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the alleged past s. 1993 Supp (3) sec.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Service Law - Appointment - To the post of Constable · - Denied on the ground that criminal case was initiated against the candidate - Claim for appointment - Held: The candidate was honourably acquitted by the criminal court and he had not concealed the fact of criminal case - Hence, his past conduct would not disqualify the candidate for appointment- Punjab Police Rules, 1934, Vol. II - r. 12. 18. Allowing the appeals, the Court HELD: 1. The acquittal of the appellant was an "honourable" acquittal in every sense and purpose. Therefore, the appellant should not have been deprived from being
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Commissioner of Police v. Raj Kumar
- 2021 The State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Love Kush Meena
- 2020 Anil Bhardwaj v. The Hon’ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh & Ors.
- 2019 The State of Madhya Pradesh & Ors. v. Bunty
Of those, 1 relied on · 2 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.