Supreme Court of India
K.C. Bajaj and Others v. Union of India and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the ratio of the Digambar's case cannot be invoked to justify the pick and choose methodology adopted by the Union of India in resisting the claim of similarly situated doctors that NPA 0 payable to them shall be taken into consideration for calculating the pension.
Judgment, page 35
From the headnote
Service Law: c Non Practicing Allowance (NPA) - Inclusion of, for calculating the pension - For the doctors employed with different departments of Central Government other than the doctors in Defence services - The benefit denied relying on the case wherein Supreme Court denied such benefit to the doctors of defence services - Held: The case of doctors in defence services was covered by Circular dated 7.6.1999 issued by Ministry of Defence - The case of the doctors in different departments was covered by O.M. dated 7.4.1998 issued by Ministry of Personnel (Public Grievances and Pension),
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.