Supreme Court of India
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and Another v. G. Sarvothaman
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the Chief Commissioner as well as the High Court have failed to appreciate that the D respondent was working in a cadre in which there was no reservation for promotion under physically handicapped quota.
Judgment, page 9
From the headnote
PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES, PROTECTION OF RIGHTS AND FULL PARTICIPATION) ACT, 1995: s. 59 - Chief Commissioner - Functions of - Explained - Complaint by respondent-physically handicapped (PH) person for not providing him reservation in promotion - Chief Commissioner directing to include Telecom Operating Assistants (TOA) cadre in the list of notified jobs and to prepare 100 point reservation register for PH persons and to consider claim of respondent - Held: Promotion in physically handicapped quota was limited to certain categories of posts as identified by High Powered
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.