Supreme Court of India
Prashant Bharti v. State of Nct of Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: s. 482 read with s.401 - Quashing of criminal proceedings - Allegations leveled by prosecutrix against accused for commission offences punishable ulss 328, 354 and 376 on false promise of marriage - Charge-sheet filed - Charges framed - Held: In the charge sheet, Investigating Officer acknowledged that he could not find any proof to substantiate the charges - Charge-sheet was filed only on the basis of statement of prosecutrix u/s 164 - Further, in view of scientific investigation as revealed by mobile phones of prosecufrix and accused, commission of offence
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 Biswajyoti Chatterjee v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
- 2024 Xxxx v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Another
- 2017 Vineet Kumar & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.
- 2026 Rahul v. State of Uttar Pradesh
- 2023 Naim Ahamed v. State (nct of Delhi)
Of those, 3 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.