Supreme Court of India
M/s. Uniworth Textiles Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
5 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the extended period of limitation under the said provision could not be invoked against the appellant.
Judgment, page 25
From the headnote
Customs Act, 1962 - s.28 r!w the proviso thereto and s. 112 - Levy of customs duty and penalty - Challenge to - Plea of assessee-appellant that the demand of duty along with the penalty was barred by limitation turned down by Tribunal - Held: Conclusion of the Tribunal that mere non payment of duties is equivalent to collusion or willful ·misstatement or suppression of facts is untenable - S.28 contemplates two situations, viz. inadvertent non-payment and deliberate default - The former is canvassed in the main body of s.28 and is met with a limitation period of six months, whereas the
Authorities it was built on
- 1989 Padmini Products v. Collector of Central Excise, Bangalore
- 1989 Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad. v. Chemphar Drugs & Liniments, Hyderabad.
- 2001 M/s Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs
- 2003 M/s. Easland Combines, Coimbatore v. The Collector of Central Excise, Coimbatore
- 2005 Union of India and Ors. v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
- 2004 Sarabhai M. Chemicals v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara
- 2005 M/s. Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut
- 2006 Aban Loyd Chiles Offshore Limited and Ors. v. Commissioner of Customs, Maharashtra
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Ram Kishan v. Sh. Tarun Bajaj & Ors.
- 2021 Commissioner of Gst and Central Excise v. M/s Citi Bank N. A.
- 2020 M/s. L. R. Brothers Indo Flora Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise
- 2017 Commissioner Central Excise, Bangalore v. M/s. United Spirits Ltd. & Anr.
- 2022 C.C., C.E. & S.T. – Bangalore (adjudication) Etc. v. M/s Northern Operating Systems Pvt Ltd.
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.