Supreme Court of India
Nishant Aggarwal v. Kailash Kumar Sharma
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We hold that the ratio laid down in K. Khaskaran (supra) squarely applies to the G case on hand.
Judgment, page 14
From the headnote
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881: 8 ss.138 and 141 - Dishonour of cheque - Territorial c jurisdiction - In view of the law laid down in Bhaskaran's case, the Magistrate in whose jurisdiction the drawee resides and, as such, has filed the complaint, has territorial jurisdiction to try the complaint- s.178 of the Code has widened the scope of jurisdiction of a criminal court and s. 179 of ihe Code has 0 stretched it to still a wider horizon - Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - ss. 177, 178 and 179 - Jurisdiction. The respondent/complainant, a resident of and carrying on business in District
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2014 Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.
- 2013 Devendra Kishanlal Dagalia v. Dwarkesh Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
- 2013 M/s. Escorts Limited v. Rama Mukherjee
Of those, 1 referred to · 2 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.