Supreme Court of India
Ravirala Laxmaiah v. State of A.P.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the above, we do not find any cogent reason to interfere with the judgments and orders of the courts below.
Judgment, page 18
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - ss.302 & 404 - Homicidal death by ·strangulation - Conviction of appellant for killing his wife - Propriety - Held: Appellant had been doubting the character of his wife and therefore, had adequate motive to eliminate her - In spite of the fact that he had been in the same room, he failed to furnish any explanation as under what circumstances his wife was found dead - Particularly, in view of the fact that the courts below excluded the theory of suicide - Same conclusion stands fully fortified by the fact that the saree of deceased was lying in the comer of the room and the
Authorities it was built on
- 2006 Trimukh Maroti Kirkan v. State of Maharashtra
- 1999 State of Maharashtra v. Suresh
- 2012 Neel Kumar @ Anil Kumar v. The State of Haryana
- 1992 Ganeshlal v. State of Maharashtra
- 1972 Nika Ram v. The State of Himachal Pradesh
- 1992 State of U.P. v. Dr. Ravindra Prakash Mittal
- 2008 Ponnusamy v. State of Tamil Nadu
- 2001 Ganesh Lal v. State of Rajasthan
- 1999 State of Tamil Nadu v. Rajendran
- 1995 Gulabchand v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.