Supreme Court of India
Bhanwar Kanwar v. R.K. Gupta & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that both Prashant and the appellant suffered physical and mental injury due to the misleading advertisement, unfair trade practice and negligence of the respondents.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - s.14(1)(f) - Medical treatment - Deceit - Appellant's son suffering from convulsions/fits- Respondent no.1, an Ayurvedic practitioner, had claimed through advertisement that he had total cure for such convulsions/fits - Allegation of deceptive practice by respondent no. 1 - that he administered Allopathic medicines passing them off as ayurvedic medicines - Held: The respondents relied on a letter dated 24th February, 2003 ·issued by the Medical Education Department, Government of U.P. to suggest that the Aurvedic/Unani Practitioners practicing. Ayurvedic System
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.