Supreme Court of India
State of Uttarakhand v. Yogendra Nath Arora
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In the result, we do not find any merit in this appeal and it is dismissed accordingly with the aforesaid observation.
Judgment, page 10
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - s.19(1)(c) - Sanction for prosecution - Competent authority - Employee of an undertaking of the State of Uttar Pradesh - Consequently taken on deputation and posted in a undertaking of the State of Uttarakhand - While working there, case lodged against employee-respondent u/s. 7 rlw s. 13(1 )(d) and 13(2) of the Act - Respondent repatriated on the same day to his parent organization by the State Government of Uttarakhand which also granted sanction for his prosecution - High Court quashed prosecution holding that the State Government of the Uttar Pradesh
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.