Supreme Court of India
State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Honble Mr. Justice (retd) Ramesh Amritlal Mehta & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the appellant has not been able to rebut presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act.
Judgment, page 31
From the headnote
Constitution of India, 1950: Art. 137 - Review Petition - On the ground of difference o of opinion in the judgment under renew and a subsequent judgment - Held: In the light of distinctive features in Gujarat Act and in Kamataka Act which have been clearly spelt out in the judgment under review and in the subsequent judgment and the grounds raised in the review petitions having been dealt with in detail in the judgment under review and concluded by adducing adequate reasons, no case for review is made out and there is no apparent error in the impugned judgment - Review petitions are dismissed
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.