Supreme Court of India
Krushnakant B. Parmar v. Union of India & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Service law: Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - r. 3(1)(ii) and (iii) - Employee unauthorisedly absent from duty for three consecutive periods - Held guilty of violating r. 3(1)(ii) and (iii) for failure to maintain devotion to duty and conduct 0 unbecoming of government servant - Order of dismissal from service - Said order upheld by the appellate authority, the tribunal and the High Court - On appeal, held: In a Departmental proceeding, if a/legation of unauthorised absence from duty is made, the disciplinary authority is required to prove that the absence is wilful, in absence
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 H.P. State Electricity Board Ltd. v. Maresh Dahiya
- 2014 Chennai Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board and Others v. T.T. Murali Babu
Of those, 1 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.