Supreme Court of India
Sukhdev Singh v. State of Haryana
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - s.42(2) [as pre-amended] and s.15 - Reporting of information reduced to writing to higher officer - Non compliance - Effect - Held: On facts, the information was received by PW1 Investigating Officer on 4th February, 1994, thus, s.42(2) as amended w.e.f. 2nd October,2001 vide Amending Act No.9 of 2001 would not apply, and instead the pre-amended s.42(2) would govern the case - PW1, while on patrol duty, had received secret information against the accused - However, as per the statement of PW1, no effort was made by him to reduce the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2016 Girish Raghunath Mehta v. Inspector of Customs and Another
- 2016 Mahiman Singh v. State of Uttarakhand
Of those, 1 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.