Supreme Court of India
Manohar S/o Manikrao Anchule v. State of Maharashtra and Anr
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that the appellant C had shown that the default, if any on his part, was not without reasonable cause or result of a persistent default on his part.
Judgment, page 31
From the headnote
Right to Information Act, 2005: c s.20 - Powers of the State Information Commission to . impose penalty and take disciplinary action against the employees - Scope and ambit of - Held: State Information Commissions exercise quasi judicial powers - They are vested with wide powers including imposition of penalty or taking of disciplinary action against the employees - Provisions relating to penalty or to penal consequences have to be construed strictly. s.20(2) - Recommending disciplinary action against the Central/State Public Information Officer u/s. 20(2) - Applicability of principle of
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2023 Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India
- 2022 Union of India & Anr v. M/s Mohit Minerals Pvt. Ltd. through Director
- 2014 B.A. Linga Reddy Etc. Etc. v. Karnatakastate Transport Authority & Ors.
Of those, 3 relied on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.