Supreme Court of India

Ritesh Sinha v. The State of Utiar Pradesh & Anr.

Neutral citation
Reported as [2012] 11 S.C.R. 683
Bench Aftab Alam and Ranjana Prakash Desai JJ.
Decided 7 December 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

For the reasons discussed above, I am unable to accept the views taken in the Bombay decision and to my mind the decision in Telgi is not the correct enunciation of law.

Judgment, page 66

From the headnote

Investigation: Identification of accused - Voice sample - Power of c Magistrate to issue summons to accused to appear before Investigating Officer and give his voice sample - Held: Taking voice sample of an accused by the police during investigation is not hit by Art. 20(3) of the Constitution - However, there is no specific provision either in the Code of Criminal Procedure 0 or in any other Jaw under which a Magistrate can authorize the investigating agency to record voice sample of a person accused of an offence - There being difference of opinion as regards the interpretation of the

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.