Supreme Court of India
Surinder Kumar v. State of Punjab
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Evidence Act, 1872 - s. 32 - Dying declaration - Appreciation and admissibility of - Discussed. Penal Code, 1860 - ss. 3048 and 498A - Death of married woman due to burn injuries - Victim gave declaration/ statement squarely blaming her husband - Statement/ declaration was recorded by a police official in the presence c of two doctors - Conviction of victim's husband i.e. the appellant by Courts below - Justification of - Held: The dying declaration of the victim was voluntary and truthful - It was not made under any pressure - The dying declaration contained facts which would not have been
Authorities it was built on
- 1992 Smt. Paniben v. State of Gujarat
- 2001 Smt. Laxmi v. Om Prakash and Ors.
- 2010 Govindappa & Ors. v. State of Karnataka
- 2009 Satish Ambanna Bansode v. State of Maharashtra
- 2010 Amit Kumar & Anr. v. State of Punjab
- 2009 Sukanti Moharana v. State of Orissa
- 2009 Kamalavva & Anr. v. State of Karnataka
Where later benches applied it
- 2022 The State of Jharkhand v. Shailendra Kumar Rai @ Pandav Rai
- 2014 Harish Kumar v. State of Haryana
- 2015 Ramakant Mishra @ Lalu Etc. v. State of U.P. & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 distinguished
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.