Supreme Court of India
Ex-hav. Satbir Singh v. The Chief of the Army Staff, New Delhi & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
We hold that for the purpose of terminal benefits, the "intervening period" for which the appellant remained out of job shall be counted.
Judgment, page 6
From the headnote
SERVICE LAW· Terminal benefits - Army - Havildar discharged/ c terminated from service prior to date of his superannuation on the ground that he had earned 4 "Red Ink Entries" - High Court directing reinstatement of incumbent, with no benefit of salary for interviewing period - Held: Admittedly, the incumbent having not worked during the intervening period, High Court was justified in disallowing the salary for that period - However, having found the discharge/termination legally unsustainable, High Court ought to have issued direction for counting the intervening period for the purpose of
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.