Supreme Court of India

Satish Batra v. Sudhir Rawal

Neutral citation
Reported as [2012] 9 S.C.R. 662
Bench K.S. Radhakrishnan and Dipak Misra JJ.
Decided 18 October 2012

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We are of the view that the High Court has completely misunderstood the dictum laid down in the above mentioned judgment and came to a wrong conclusion of law for more than one reason, which will be more evident when we scan through E the subsequent judgments of this Court.

Judgment, page 8

From the headnote

Contract - Agreement to sell - Payment of earnest money - Agreement stipulating forfeiture of earnest money c by the seller on failure on the part of purchaser to pay the sale amount before specified date - Failure on the part of purchaser in payment of sale amount as per the agreement - Forfeiture of earnest money by seller- Propriety of - Held: Part payment of purchase price cannot be forfeited unless it is guarantee 0 for the due performance of contract - Forfeiture of entire amount of earnest money depends on the terms of the agreement - On facts, the earnest money was a security for the

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 4 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.