Supreme Court of India
M.R. Prabhakar and Others v. Canara Bank and Others
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that the appellants have failed to show any pre-existing rights in their favour either in the Statutory SettlemenUJoint Note dated 29.10.1993 or under the C Regulations 1995.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Service Law: c Pension - In lieu of Contributory Provident Fund - Introduced by Banks, pursuant to Statutory Settlement, Joint Note andPension Regulations, 1995- Entitlement to pension to the employees resigning prior to the Settlement and Regulations - Held: Not entitled as they were not covered by the Scheme of pension under the Settlement and the Regulations - They could not establish any pre-existing legal, statutory or fundamental rights to claim the benefits of the Regulations - Canara Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995 - Regulations 22 and 29. Indian Banks Association,
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2025 United Bank of India (now Punjab National Bank) v. Swapan Kumar Mullick & Ors.
- 2015 Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India Ltd. & Ors. v. Shree Lal Meena
- 2015 Asger Ibrahimamin v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
Of those, 1 distinguished · 2 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.