Supreme Court of India
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Surendra Kori
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the considered opinion that in view of the magnitude of the crime, the number of documents alleged to have been executed fraudulently, the reports referred to in the charge-sheets and the involvement of the respondent etc. could E be decided only if an opportunity is given to the prosecution.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973: c s.482 - Exercise of inherent power by High Court - Explained. s.482 - Petition seeking to quash FIR - FIR against respondents for offences punishable ulss.420, 467, 468, 471 rlw ss.34 and 1208 /PC and ss.34 and 81 of Registration Act - Allegations of registration of fake sale deeds on fictitious documents to avail of the Special Rehabilitation Package meant for oustees of Sardar Sarovar Project - FIR quashed by High Court- Held: Respondent was functioning as Deputy Registrar during the relevant period when more than 102 sale deeds relating to the same
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2021 Mahendra K C v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
- 2023 Sri Gulam Mustafa v. The State of Karnataka & Anr.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.