Supreme Court of India
State of N.C.T. of Delhi v. Ajay Kumar Tyagi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
For the reasons stated above, the order of the High Court is unsustainable, both on facts and law.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - s. 482 - Criminal proceedings against accused under Prevention of Corruption Act for demand and acceptance of illegal gratification - Departmental proceedings also initiated on the same charges - Report of enquiry officer observing that charges not proved - Disciplinary proceedings kept in abeyance due to pendency o of criminal case - High Court in a writ petition holding that keeping the departmental proceedings in abeyance was justified - In a petition uls. 482 High Court quashed the criminal proceedings holding that as the accused has been exonerated in
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
Of those, 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.