Supreme Court of India
Syed Ahmed v. State of Karnataka
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
1 Supreme Court bench has cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that the High Court did not commit any error in reappraising the evidence for arriving at the truth of the matter.
Judgment, page 13
From the headnote
Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - ss. 7 & 13(1)(d) rlw 8 s. 13(2) - Offences under - Prosecution case that appellant- a police official, demanded and accepted illegal gratification from PW1 for inquiring into a complaint lodged by him against his neighbour - Trial court acquitted the appellant - High Court, however, reversed the acquittal of appellant and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for three months - On appeal, held: There was sufficient evidence of the appellant demanding illegal gratification from PW1 and receiving and accepting it when given by him - Testimony of PW1 was
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.