Supreme Court of India
Narender Kumar v. State (nct) of Delhi
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
Before parting with the case, we would like to record our appreciation to Mr.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Penal Code, 1860 - s. 376 - Commission of offence under - Conviction and sentence by the courts below on basis of the testimony of the prosecutrix - On appeal, held: When the court finds it difficult to accept the version of the prosecutrix on its face value, it may search for evidence, direct or substantial, which may lend assurance to her testimony - On facts, it cannot be said that the prosecutrix was not knowing o the appellant prior to the incident - Facts and circumstances, make it crystal clear that if the evidence of the prosecutrix is read and considered in totality of the
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2017 Mukesh & Anr. v. State for Nct of Delhi & Ors.
- 2015 Ravindra v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2013 Ganga Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
- 2013 Lillu @ Rajesh & Anr. v. State of Haryana
Of those, 1 relied on · 3 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.