Supreme Court of India
Union of India & Ors. v. Madhu E.V. & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In the result, there is no substance in the contention of the learned counsel for the respondents that on the basis of Rule 49 of the CCS (Pension) Rules or on the basis of the GO, the respondents who have retired after completing qualifying service of 10 years but before completing qualifying service of 20 years by voluntary retirement, are entitled to get pensionary benefits.
Judgment, page 7
From the headnote
Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - r. 19 - Constables in Border Security Force (BSF) resigning from service on completion of 10 years of service - Constables allowed to resign with pensionary benefits ulr. 19 - Pensionary benefits - Entitlement to - Held: r. 19 does not entitle any pensionary benefits on resignation of its personnel - However, by virtue of .O. dated December 27, 1995 read with r. 19 of Rules, a o member of BSF would be entitled to get pensionary benefits if he is otherwise eligible - Such personnel must satisfy eligibility under CCS (Pension) Rules which does not provide
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.