Supreme Court of India

Raghbir Singh Sehrawat v. State of Haryana and Others

Neutral citation
Reported as [2011] 14 S.C.R. 1113
Bench G.S. Singhvi and Sudhansu Jyoti . Mukhopadhaya JJ.
Decided 23 November 2011

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

12 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

We hold that the record prepared by the revenue authorities showing delivery of possession of the acquired land to HSllDC has no legal sanctity C and the High Court committed serious error by dismissing the writ petition on the specious ground that possession of the acquired land had been taken and the same vested in the State Government in terms of Section 16.

Judgment, page 22

From the headnote

Land Acquisition Act, 1894: c ss. 4(1), 6(1), 5A(2) and 9 - Acquisition of agricultural land - Issuance of notification and declaration ulss. 4(1) and 6(1) - Passing of award by the Land Acquisition Collector - Writ petition by the appellant-land owner challenging the acquisition of land - On the ground of non-publication of 0 Notifications; not. given opportunity of hearing by the Laryd Acquisition Collector; not served notice as per the mandate; and that the possession of the land was still with him and the paper possession taken by the respondents was inconsequential - Writ petition

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.