Supreme Court of India
Ganduri Koteshwaramma & Anr. v. Chakiri Yanadi & Anr.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
4 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the view that unless a partition of the property is c effected by metes and pounds, the daughters cannot be deprived of the benefits conferred by the Act.
Judgment, page 16
From the headnote
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - s. 6 (as amended by Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005): Devolution of interest in coparcenary property - Rights and liabilities of the daughter- Held: Daughter of a copercener becomes a coparcener by birth in her own rights and liabilities in the same manner as the son - This is effective from 0 September 9, 2005 - Right accrued to a daughter in the property is absolute, except where disposition or alienation including any partition/testamentary disposition of property has taken place before December 2fJ, 2004, as provided in the proviso to sub-section (1) of
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Ors.
- 2018 Danamma @ Suman Surpur & Anr. v. Amar and Ors.
- 2023 Prasanta Kumar Sahoo & Ors. v. Charulata Sahu & Ors.
- 2015 Prakash & Ors. v. Phulavati & Ors.
Of those, 2 relied on · 1 referred to · 1 mentioned
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.