Supreme Court of India
Malthesh Gudda Pooja v. State of Karnataka & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
From the headnote
Karnataka High Court Rules, 1959: c Rule 5 of Chapter 3 of High Court Rules read with 0. 47, rr. 1 and 5 CPC and Notification dated 29.12.2008 issued by Karnataka High Court - Review of judgment delivered at Circuit Bench - Judges or anyone of them who delivered the original judgment not sitting at Circuit Bench - Listing of review petition as per roster of Circuit Bench - llELD: Rule 5 of Chapter 3 of High Court Rules will prevail over r.5 of 0.47 CPC - There is no inconsistency between r. 5 of Chapter 3 of High Court Rules and r.5 of 0.47, CPC- The words 'absence or other cause for a period
Authorities it was built on
Where later benches applied it
- 2018 M/s. Goel Ganga Developers India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India through Secretary Ministry of Environment and Forests & Ors.
- 2017 Krishna Veni Nagam v. Harish Nagam
- 2017 Santhini v. Vijaya Venketesh
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 distinguished · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.