Supreme Court of India

Mohd. Imran Khan v. State (govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Neutral citation
Reported as [2011] 15 S.C.R. 1030
Bench P. Sathasivam and Dr. B.S. Chauhan JJ.
Decided 10 October 2011

INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.

3 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.

What the Court ordered

In view of the above as we have seen the original record produced before us, we are of the considered opinion that the E prosecutrix was less than 16 years of age on the date of incident.

Judgment, page 14

From the headnote

Penal Code, 1860- s.376 - Rape - Age of prosecutrix -Margin of error in age ascertained by radiological c examination - Held: The medical report and the deposition of the Radiologist cannot predict the exact date of birth, rather it gives an idea with a long margin of 1 to 2 years on either side. Penal Code, 1860 - s.376 - Rape - Testimony of prosecutrix - Appreciation of - Held: The statement of prosecutrix, if found to be worthy of credence and reliable, requires no corroboration - The court may convict the accused on the sole testimony of the prosecutrix - On facts, the trial court found

Where later benches applied it

Of those, 1 relied on · 2 referred to

Sign in free to read it

  • The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
  • The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
  • Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
  • Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
  • Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
Sign in to read - for free

An email address, no password.