Supreme Court of India
Jaipur Vikas Pradhikaran v. Sri Ashok Kumar Choudhary & Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
What the Court ordered
In view of the aforesaid alleged lapses and willful default on the part of the respondent no.1, the aforesaid complaint was filed by the appellant under Section 35 of the Advocates Act alleging misconduct against the respondent no.1, as also the C respondent no. 2 and 3 on the ground that the respondent no.1 appeared for claimant prior to his engagement as counsel for the appellant.
Judgment, page 12
From the headnote
ADVOCATES ACT, 1961: c s. 35 - Advocate - Professional misconduct - Advocate engaged by Vikas Pradikaran as a retaining counsel - He appeared in a reference case on behalf of his sister in which Vikas Pradikaran was contesting the claims, and also accepted the engagement given to him by Vikas Pradikaran 0 as it counsel to contest ttJe claims in _the said reference case, but did not defend it in the case, as a result of which the compensation was enhanced from Rs. 16,2001- to Rs. 1.25 crores by the reference court - The order was a/so not communicated to the client - Complaint by the Vikas
Authorities it was built on
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.