Supreme Court of India
Mig Cricket Club v. Abhinav Sahakar Education Society and Ors.
INSC stands for INDIAN SUPREME COURT. A neutral citation scheme assigned by the Court itself, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter. INSC is the neutral citation scheme assigned by the Supreme Court, so a judgment can be cited without depending on a commercial law reporter.
2 Supreme Court benches have cited this judgment.
What the Court ordered
We are of the opinion that town planning requires high degree of expertise and that is best left to the decision of State Government to which the advise of the expert body is available.
Judgment, page 17
From the headnote
Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: ss.31(1), 37(2) - Sanction to draft development plan - Held: Development Plan existing prior to the coming into force of the Act shall be deemed to be a sanctioned Development Plan u/s.31(1) of Act - In the instant case, the Development Plan existing prior to the commencement of the Act showed the area in question as reserved for "playground" which was modified to "school and cultural society" by State Governn:ient in exercise of its power u/s.37(2) and earmarked for the "school and cultural centre" by notification dated 25th April, 1985 -
Where later benches applied it
- 2020 The Director General (road Development) National Highways Authority of India v. Aam Aadmi Lokmanch & Ors.
- 2020 Indore Development Authority v. Manoharlal & Ors. Etc.
Of those, 1 relied on · 1 referred to
Sign in free to read it
- The full judgment, page by page, as published in the Supreme Court Reports
- The ratio: what the Court held, verbatim, with the page it sits on
- Every bench that relied on it, and every bench that argued against it
- Search every reported judgment, by party, citation or question
- Download the PDF, copy pinpoint citations ready for a filing
An email address, no password.